background for news stories
?
A few days ago, WeChat official account, a WeChat of an entertainment news, posted a message that Fan Bingbing and Jerry Lee "bought nearly 10 million luxury houses in Qingdao", and the article also attached pictures of the property rights information of their houses. In the picture, the information such as house property right number and property right value is clearly visible; In the column of "Name of obligee", the names of "Fan Bingbing" and "Jerry Lee" are impressively listed, as well as the mosaic ID number.
?
In order not to further infringe on the rights of relevant people, Xiaobian has blurred the real estate information in the picture. The white part in the picture is the mosaic mask of the original picture.
?
In this regard, some netizens questioned that the relevant staff of Qingdao Municipal Bureau of Land Resources and Housing Management were suspected of taking advantage of their positions to infringe upon and disclose citizens’ personal privacy information, and filed a complaint in official website.
?
?
Yesterday afternoon, the Qingdao Municipal Bureau of Land and Resources and the Housing Authority responded through the official Weibo.
?
Comment and interpretation
?
> > > > Interpretation: Is the mosaic of the picture a disclosure of privacy?
?
In view of the identity of Fan Bingbing and Jerry Lee as public figures, this incident has attracted the attention of many netizens. Some netizens questioned: Aren’t all the pictures of their real estate information mosaiced? Why is it an invasion of privacy?
?
Citizens’ real estate registration information belongs to citizens’ personal information and should be protected by law. According to the Provisional Regulations on Real Estate Registration, real estate registration agencies, real estate registration information sharing units and their staff should keep the real estate registration information confidential. Real estate registration information involving state secrets shall take necessary security measures according to law.
?
Obviously, the page of the real estate information registration system displayed in the leaked information picture can only be seen by internal staff.
?
The entertainment news company involved will release the picture again, thenBoth the relevant staff and this public number are involved in infringement of privacy, which is a civil infringement.
?
The key to judging whether it is an invasion of privacy is to see whether the information released by the publisher has obvious direction.Although the address information and ID number are partially mosaiced in the picture released by this entertainment news company, the names and birth dates of Fan Bingbing and Jerry Lee are very obvious, and the direction is very clear, so even if they are mosaiced, they are still an infringement of privacy.
?
Compared with ordinary citizens, the privacy right of stars will make appropriate concessions to meet the public’s concern for stars, but this transfer is not bottomless.
?
In addition, if the relationship between the staff of the real estate registration center and the official number is buying and selling, it may be suspected of the crime of illegally selling citizens’ personal information and the crime of illegally obtaining citizens’ personal information, but the prerequisite for a crime is that the circumstances are serious.
?
> > > > Comment: Is the dismissal of the staff over?
?
Qingdao Municipal Bureau of Land and Resources and Housing Authority finally took "dismissing the staff member" as the result of handling this matter. Is this matter really solved?
?
Although the relevant units apologize deeply, and will take this as a lesson, draw inferences from others, strengthen education, further improve the work system, and put an end to such problems, the handling result of this incident is hardly satisfactory. You can’t just give up your privacy.
?
It is really difficult for a star to have privacy, whether it is traveling, shopping, dining, entertainment, etc., it may be exposed. However, it is another matter that the pictures of the property right information of the purchased real estate are posted on the Internet, because it involves the illegal operation or even malicious operation of the relevant staff, which is not a simple violation of work discipline, but an infringement on the privacy rights that others should be protected by law.Simply dismissing the staff involved, if the parties do not pursue it, the media will no longer pay attention to it and ask questions. It is indeed possible that things will pass, but this is not a serious way to deal with it.
?
Similar to this incident, the minor family members of jane doe police in Rugao City, Jiangsu Province entered the public security network to inquire about the privacy of two artists, Yifeng Li and Yang Yang, and leaked the private information including their ID numbers, previous names, household registration places and so on.Rugao Public Security Bureau handled it this way: quickly set up an investigation team to investigate,After finding out the facts, the policewoman involved was given an administrative demerit, and the person in charge of the squadron was also given an administrative warning.
?
It is not difficult to see that in terms of accountability, the relevant units in Rugao and Qingdao are very different.Rugao City Public Security Bureau did not directly give the results because of public opinion doubts, but after a standardized investigation.There are meticulous processes, such as setting up an investigation team to investigate, which makes people still have confidence in their management system.
?
The Qingdao Housing Authority directly gave a result of "dismissing staff".It is inevitable to give people the suspicion that the system is not standardized, the investigation is not emphasized, and the results are simply processed to calm public opinion.
?
In view of this, their official Weibo said, "Take this as a mirror, draw inferences from others, strengthen education, further improve the work system, and put an end to such problems", etc., which makes people feel more like rhetoric and empty talk, and it is difficult to see the sincerity of apology and the seriousness of handling it.Because from the processing results, we can’t see who should be responsible for the management and system omissions of the unit.
?
(This article Source: CCTV News WeChat WeChat official account; Source: Xinhua News Agency Editor’s Email: shguancha@sina.com)